|
Managing HCV in Nonresponders to Interferon
Including Patients With Normal ALT Levels
BRUCE R. BACON, MD:
Thank you, Gene and Will, and for those of you who came tonight.
Well, Ira said that the patients who responded and relapsed were a
thorn in the side. I've said before at meetings like this that
nonresponders are job security for hepatologists. And it has been
really a frustrating problem for us to have so many patients that
wouldn't respond to monotherapy. The relapsers gave us a little
hint that maybe there was something that we were doing right, and
then when combination therapy came around, I think we were all
satisfied that patients who were re-treated did very well and
frequently had a sustained response. But the nonresponders have
been...continue...have continued to be fairly difficult to
manage.
Now, what I'm going to do in the small amount of time allotted
is just go over the results of work that we've done at St. Louis
University. We...as many of you know, there have been a number of
investigator-initiated protocols and trials done around the United
States. And we set one up where we would re-treat interferon
monotherapy nonresponders and relapsers for either 24 weeks of 48
weeks with combination therapy followed by a six-month follow-up.
And I'm just going to show you tonight the nonresponder data, and
this is still...this study is not completely finished yet, so this
is an interim analysis as of a few months ago.
There were a total of 124 nonresponders. And our definition of a
nonresponder here is someone who received standard doses of any of
the alpha interferons for a minimum of 3 months and were still HCV
RNA positive at the end of that 3-month period of time. As Gene has
said, I...we did have patients who had normal ALT's and I've been a
believer in treating liver disease not ALT levels over the years.
And so we had a number of patients that had normal ALT's who have
been in this...who were available for this study.
So there are 124 nonresponders, 64 percent men, mean age 44 1/2
years, with a range of 23 to 67 years. They were all RNA positive.
Eighty percent of them had elevated ALT's so...or 19 percent with
normal ALT's. And as would be expected in a nonresponder group of
patients, a little bit more than the usual frequency of genotype 1
patients, so 81 percent were genotype 1, as opposed to the general
population of the U.S., which is about 70 percent. And 27 of those
had cirrhosis, or 22 percent.
Now, this is a little bit tedious to follow through, but I'll
walk you through it. You see that the denominator changes, and
that's because people were enrolled over time, and we looked at the
analysis at a particular time. And this is what we have looked at.
And the only number we're...the only parameter that we're really
looking at here is negative HCV RNA by the NGI assay. So at
treatment week 12, 122 patients...whether they had been treated for
24...started to be randomized in the 24-week treatment or the
48-week treatment group. At treatment week 12, 41 percent of
patients were RNA negative. At treatment week 24, 46 percent were
RNA negative. And this would follow through with what John had said
about when to stop treatment. You get a few more if you treat
patients for a little while longer with combination therapy. And 44
percent by end of treatment, whether it was for 24 weeks or for 48
weeks, were HCV RNA negative.
Now, the important time to really look and see how these
patients are doing is in their follow-up, obviously. And at 12
weeks' follow-up, 31 percent were RNA negative, so several patients
had relapsed. A few more relapsed when they were followed out for
24 weeks. But at 24 weeks of follow-up, 18 of 70 patients that had
completed by this time period were still RNA negative for 26
percent sustained response rate...sustained virologic response. And
this is all in previous monotherapy nonresponders.
Now, what difference does it make whether it's 24 weeks of
treatment or 48 weeks of treatment? As you can see here...and if
you just focus on the right hand side, which I think is the most
important set of data, the 24-week follow-up data...there really
isn't much difference for this group of patients so far between 24
or 48 weeks. The sustained response rate is about the same.
Well, genotype, as we've heard, makes a big difference, and this
is again illustrated in our group, such that if we look at the
24-week follow-up data, non-1 genotype is 57 percent. But
importantly, genotype 1 is about 18 percent, so if we take our
genotype 1 patients that had previously not responded, we can get
about a 20 percent sustained response rate with retreatment.
And finally, the business about normal or elevated ALT's. As you
can see, at all points, whether it's at the end of treatment
sustained response rate...sustained virologic response rate, at the
12-week follow-up or at the 24-week follow-up, there's no
difference between whether or not patients had a normal ALT going
into this or an elevated ALT.
So in conclusion, we're of the opinion that the combination of
interferon and ribavirin may induce a sustained response in
previous nonresponders to interferon monotherapy in at least 25
percent of patients. And we've now looked at a few more months of
therapy, and this has actually gotten a little bit better as we
follow patients...as we have more patients completing, and it's up
to around 30 percent. And the same different-...the same issues are
there relative to normal ALT or non-ALT, whether they have
cirrhosis or not and the genotype differences. Those differences
have remained the same. And of those with the sustained response at
24 weeks, many had a predictor of poor response. We shouldn't
exclude cirrhotics from treatment because 28 percent of them...28
percent of the sustained responders were cirrhotics. Fifty-six
percent were genotype 1, and several of them had high HCV RNA
levels. But it seems to not make too much difference between 24 and
48 weeks of treatment. And I want to wait until the whole study is
completely finished before we make too much of a conclusion about
the 24 or 48 weeks. Thank you.
|
Retreatment of Nonresponders with
Interferon/Ribavirin
Baseline Characteristics
|
|
|
124 nonresponders; 79 males (64%)
|
|
Meanage, 44.6 years (rante, 23 to 67 years)
|
|
All HCV RNA Positive
|
|
100 with elevated ALT (81%)
|
|
101 with genotype 1 (81%)
|
|
27 with cirrhosis (22%)
|
| Retreatment of Nonresponders with
Interferon/Ribavirin:
Virologic Response Rates
(Undetectable HCV RNA)
|
|
| 50/122 (41%) at treatment week 12 |
| 50/108 (46%) at treatment week 24 |
| 44/101 (44%) at end of treatment (24 & 48
weeks) |
| 27/88 (31%) at 12 weeks of follow-up |
| 18/70 (26%) at 24 weeks of follow-up |
Retreatment of Nonresponders with
Interferon/Ribavirin:
Conclusions
|
|
Interferon/Ribavirin may induce a sustained
response in
previous nonresponders to interferon monotherapy |
Of those with sustained response at 24 weeks
follow-up,
many had predictors of poor response:
--28 % Cirrhotic
--56% Genotype 1
--56% HCV RNA 3x106
|
| Response rates were similar for 24 or 48 weeks
of therapy |
[Symposium
Contents]
|